CEM Benchmark

Release 2026.3 · Reviewed July 2, 2026

Placements & Scheduling

Clinical site management, placement lifecycle, rotation scheduling, capacity, and workflow automation. Compare 5 capabilities across 9 vendors in release 2026.3.

Vendor scores

Module score is the percentage of cited capabilities supported within this functional area.

Exxat100% · 5/5
Trajecsys100% · 5/5
Typhon100% · 5/5
CORE Higher Ed100% · 5/5
eMedley100% · 5/5
HealthTasks80% · 4/5
Project Concert80% · 4/5
Medatrax40% · 2/5
TracPrac0% · 0/5

Capability breakdown

Side-by-side vendor scores for each capability in this module. Supported capabilities include cited source excerpts.

CapabilityCORE Higher EdeMedleyExxatHealthTasksMedatraxProject ConcertTracPracTrajecsysTyphon
Clinical site directoryMaintain clinical sites with contacts, specialties, and affiliation status.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
—
✓
✓
Affiliation managementManage affiliation agreements and partner onboarding.
✓
✓
✓
✓
—
✓
—
✓
✓
Capacity & slot managementTrack available slots or capacity limits across sites and rotations.
✓
✓
✓
✓
—
—
—
✓
✓
Placement & rotation workflowEnd-to-end workflow to request, schedule, assign, and complete clinical placements and rotations.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
—
✓
✓
Automated placement & schedulingAutomated matching, conflict detection, schedule optimization, or slot assignment for placements and rotations—including rules-based workflows, algorithmic matching, and automated recommendations.
✓
✓
✓
—
—
✓
—
✓
✓

Other modules

PlatformCompliancePlacements & SchedulingClinical TrackingEvaluationsCurriculum & AccreditationReporting & Analytics

Publisher. The Clinical Education Management (CEM) Benchmark is published and maintained by HealthTasks. All vendors, including HealthTasks, are evaluated using the same published methodology and evidentiary standards based on publicly available primary sources. The benchmark is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement, certification, warranty, or guarantee regarding any vendor, product, or service.

Methodology. Scores reflect documented capability coverage based on publicly available primary vendor sources, including product documentation, help centers, knowledge bases, API documentation, and other primary-source materials available at the time of review. Scores are intended to measure documented capability coverage under the published methodology and should not be interpreted as measures of product quality, customer satisfaction, usability, market share, or overall suitability. A capability marked as not supported indicates that HealthTasks did not identify sufficient publicly available evidence to verify support under the published methodology. It does not necessarily mean the capability is absent or unavailable.

Process. Research is produced using AI-assisted analysis together with human review and is refreshed periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to ensure accuracy and consistency, errors or omissions may occur, and vendor documentation may change over time. Users should independently verify information before making purchasing, procurement, or business decisions. Machine-readable benchmark data and methodology are available at /benchmark/dataset.

Updates and Corrections. Vendors and members of the public may submit corrections or additional primary-source documentation for review. Submissions are evaluated using the same published methodology and evidentiary standards applied to all vendors. Accepted corrections may be incorporated into the current release, published in the benchmark changelog, or included in a subsequent benchmark release.

Trademarks. All company names, product names, logos, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used solely for identification, comparative research, and informational purposes. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, sponsorship by, or endorsement from their respective owners.