CEM Benchmark

Release 2026.3 · Reviewed July 2, 2026

Clinical Education Management Benchmark

A publicly cited reference standard. Structured, auditable, and reproducible.

Overall heatmap

Cross-vendor module scores. Each cell is the percentage of cited capabilities supported within that module.

Vendor	Platform	Compliance	Placements	Clinical	Evaluations	Curriculum	Reporting	Overall
HealthTasks	100%	100%	80%	100%	100%	100%	100%	96%
Exxat	100%	100%	100%	80%	100%	83%	50%	89%
CORE Higher Ed	100%	80%	100%	80%	100%	83%	50%	86%
eMedley	100%	80%	100%	80%	100%	83%	50%	86%
Project Concert	100%	80%	80%	60%	100%	100%	50%	82%
Typhon	67%	20%	100%	80%	100%	33%	50%	61%
Trajecsys	67%	0%	100%	80%	100%	17%	50%	54%
Medatrax	33%	60%	40%	60%	100%	0%	50%	43%
TracPrac	33%	80%	0%	60%	100%	0%	50%	39%

View by module

Platform Compliance Placements & Scheduling Clinical Tracking Evaluations Curriculum & Accreditation Reporting & Analytics

Vendor scores

Select vendors to compare side by side. Published scores until the next quarterly review.

HealthTasks

Overall

96%

27 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 100%Compliance 100%Placements 80%Clinical 100%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 100%Reporting 100%

Exxat

Overall

89%

25 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 100%Compliance 100%Placements 100%Clinical 80%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 83%Reporting 50%

CORE Higher Ed

Overall

86%

24 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 100%Compliance 80%Placements 100%Clinical 80%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 83%Reporting 50%

eMedley

Overall

86%

24 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 100%Compliance 80%Placements 100%Clinical 80%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 83%Reporting 50%

Project Concert

Overall

82%

23 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 100%Compliance 80%Placements 80%Clinical 60%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 100%Reporting 50%

Typhon

Overall

61%

17 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 67%Compliance 20%Placements 100%Clinical 80%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 33%Reporting 50%

Trajecsys

Overall

54%

15 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 67%Compliance 0%Placements 100%Clinical 80%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 17%Reporting 50%

Medatrax

Overall

43%

12 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 33%Compliance 60%Placements 40%Clinical 60%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 0%Reporting 50%

TracPrac

Overall

39%

11 cited

of 28 capabilities

Platform 33%Compliance 80%Placements 0%Clinical 60%Evaluations 100%Curriculum 0%Reporting 50%

Release 2026.3 · 28 capabilities · 9 vendors · Methodology v1.1. How scoring works

Publisher. The Clinical Education Management (CEM) Benchmark is published and maintained by HealthTasks. All vendors, including HealthTasks, are evaluated using the same published methodology and evidentiary standards based on publicly available primary sources. The benchmark is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement, certification, warranty, or guarantee regarding any vendor, product, or service.

Methodology. Scores reflect documented capability coverage based on publicly available primary vendor sources, including product documentation, help centers, knowledge bases, API documentation, and other primary-source materials available at the time of review. Scores are intended to measure documented capability coverage under the published methodology and should not be interpreted as measures of product quality, customer satisfaction, usability, market share, or overall suitability. A capability marked as not supported indicates that HealthTasks did not identify sufficient publicly available evidence to verify support under the published methodology. It does not necessarily mean the capability is absent or unavailable.

Process. Research is produced using AI-assisted analysis together with human review and is refreshed periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to ensure accuracy and consistency, errors or omissions may occur, and vendor documentation may change over time. Users should independently verify information before making purchasing, procurement, or business decisions. Machine-readable benchmark data and methodology are available at /benchmark/dataset.

Updates and Corrections. Vendors and members of the public may submit corrections or additional primary-source documentation for review. Submissions are evaluated using the same published methodology and evidentiary standards applied to all vendors. Accepted corrections may be incorporated into the current release, published in the benchmark changelog, or included in a subsequent benchmark release.

Trademarks. All company names, product names, logos, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used solely for identification, comparative research, and informational purposes. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, sponsorship by, or endorsement from their respective owners.